These findings suggest that the treatment’s benefit remained intact for patients after the protocol was finished.įurthermore, one only needs to assess the long list of Acyclovir side effects to determine whether it’s worth the financial outlay and health implications. These results were measured post-treatment once the person had completed a six-month clinical trial. In one independent study, those who’d suffered frequent outbreaks on a monthly or bimonthly basis went on to have no further outbreaks or just one or two outbreaks per year. By comparison, Synergy’s product reduced herpes outbreaks and cold sores permanently. The medication didn’t provide a long-term solution unless it was administered regularly, and even then, it had only a modest rate of actually stopping outbreaks from occurring. The most startling difference between the two treatments was that Acyclovir had to be used every day to suppress herpes outbreaks or cold sores. To investigate, we compared the effectiveness of Synergy’s treatment to that of Acyclovir, the most commonly used suppressant medication for herpes patients. Natural and conventional medicines have far more in common than many people realize, including those waging the battle against Synergy Pharmaceuticals. Morphine is crafted from #opium# poppies, aspirin from willow bark, and so on. For example, penicillin was created from Penicillium chrysogenum, a species of fungus that is essentially mold. Their resistance is naïve, as more than 40% of pharmaceutical drugs are derived from plants. In the views of those who are opposed, they would only trust their local doctor or a more conventional medical institution to validate a cure. Those in the latter camp are mostly individuals who haven’t used the treatment but feel strongly that natural medicine is incapable of curing any virus. Still, there are just as many who refute the treatment’s effectiveness. In reviewing online feedback and forum discussions to date, there’s a contingent of patients who have clearly been cured and who can vouch for the treatment’s ability to eradicate the virus. Their pushback is in opposition to the treatment’s proven success. Instead, Synergy Pharmaceuticals has found itself in the center of a vicious battle, spearheaded by proponents of conventional medicine. In any other scenario, one would consider such a development a monumental leap forward in herpes sufferers’ fight against the virus. But the degree to which the naysayers, the pharmaceutical industry, and conventional medicine practitioners have scrutinized Synergy’s treatment is nearly insurmountable. This claim has, unsurprisingly, attracted an incredible amount of critique and cynicism. The company bills itself as the producer of the world’s first cure for the herpes simplex virus. However, it’s Synergy’s most high-profile product that has generated controversy, not its most recent business troubles. Thankfully, after a change of ownership in May 2021, the company resumed operations. In November 2020, Synergy Pharmaceuticals Australia did shut down temporarily after facing COVID-19-related supply chain issues. Yet the Australian company has still been linked to controversy and supply concerns from its onset. The New York-based Synergy Pharmaceuticals went bust in 2016, while Synergy Pharmaceuticals Australia stayed in business. Even more confusing is that two companies are sharing the name. Its name is a bit confusing considering that its catalog features only natural vitamins. Synergy Pharmaceuticals is one such company currently facing pushback from the FDA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |